Kjver Sword Study Bible Giant Print Black Genuine Leather Indexed: King James Version Easy Read

Product Information

The KJVER® is "The Trusted King James in an Easy Read Format." The KJVER® follows the KJV more closely than any other contemporary version available.

in italics is still present and this is a major error. The word bastard is still rendered illegitimate child or the A key feature of the KJVER® Bible is the text style. Known as the King James Version Easy Read, it does not change the Word of God but helps explain difficult words and replaces clearly archaic or obsolete words. Not one word of doctrine has been changed. Cor. 3:12 KJVER says, “Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech:” boldness .........................................................................................................2 Corinthians 3:12 KJVER casts doubt on the word “plainness” of speech to “boldness” of speech in the footnotes. The words “Plainness” and “boldness” do not have the same meaning. Nowhere will you find the word “bold” in the definition for the word “plain” in the old Webster’s 1913 dictionary. I believe Modern Translation adherents are trying to cover up the fact that they don’t use the plainness of speech because they constantly refer to the original ancient languages. Jhn. 5:8 KJVER says, “And there are three that bear witness in the earth, the S pirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.” .............................................................. .......... ......................................................................... ​It should be “spirit” not “Spirit” in 1 John 5:8. This should clearly not be capitalized. Only Jesus (the second person of the Godhead) is in agreement with the water and the blood, and not the Holy Spirit. The spirit agrees with the water and the blood.Which text does the NKJV leave begotten out? I noticed John 3 v16 in the NKJV has a begotten in? Happy to read both the KJV and the NKJV and trust the Holy Spirit will lead me in to all truth while reading either. dictionary remains unchanged as well. I noted in my previous comments that this was not as critical to me I warn everyone who hears the prophetic words inn this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, 19 and if anyone takes away from the words in this prophetic book, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city described in this book. I love the KJV but I understand some people might struggle with the few archaic words, to them I would recommend the KJVER. I have read both the KJV & KJVER from Genesis through Revelation. In my humble opinion I will take a the KJVER over the NKJV. Acts 8:9 KJV says, “But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria,”

only six occasions that I have discovered where a violation of a word may have occurred. Of these six, three are minor (those dealing with the word bastard), the Jms. 1:15 KJV says, “Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.” And Moses alone shall come near the LORD: but they shall not come near ; neither shall the people go up with him. They do not add the defined words buried in the heart of the sentence itself, but simply put the defined words in a smaller font below the verse.

Jhn. 3:9 KJVER says, “Whosoever is born of God does not commit sin;” practice .................................................................................................. .......1 John 3:9 KJVER underlines the word “is” and the first letter of the word “ born” (“b") but does not explain anything in the footnote area. Maybe this explained at some place else in this translation. Not sure. But the real problem in 1 John 3:9 KJVER is the defined footnote for the word “commit.” It says that the word “commit” is defined as “practice.” Why is this a problem? Well, if Bob commits a crime, it does not mean that Bob is practicing that crime or making a habit of it. While it may be true that “practice” fits 1 John 3:9, I believe the real truth behind the word “commit” in reference to sin here is in regards to “justifying sin.” For a person can justify a little bit of sin in their life and not practice that sin and be condemned by God. The person who thinks they can sin a little or sin sometimes and be saved by God’s grace without any change in their life is the kind of person who has never known Christ or they fall under the truth of Ezekiel 18:24. For John is concerned with us confessing sin so as to be forgiven of sin (1 John 1:9), and in walking in the light so the blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7). So it’s having the right attitude towards sin. Are we going to justify sin, or are we going to battle and fight against it? Saying that we are to not practice sin opens the door to letting a little bit of sin on into our lives. This is not an okay thing with God. So the word “practice” is not a good definition for the word “commit” here in the footnote. ........................................................................................................................ emendation that I have found thus far. It contains, as I have discovered thus far, only one critical error Any bible version with an “N” meaning New has differences which may not be significant to most people who read God’s word. But to someone who studies it closely, there can be differences which significantly changes the meaning or context of a portion…